Self-serving and self-perpetuating Select Board Chair Maureen “Our Lady of Perpetual Bullshit” Cranson, Sterling’s WEASEL DI TUTTI WEASEL, and John “Bent Buffoon” Kilcoyne, her fellow ArchWeasel on the Sterling Select Board, effectively tanked/subverted the will of Sterling’s 2022 Annual Town Meeting voters who approved expanding the Sterling Select Board from three (3) members to five (5). Such expansion would, of course, dilute Cranson’s and Kilcoyne’s malign influence upon the Town and its citizens. That expansion requires passage of a legislative Act. Cranson and Kilcoyne, of course, wish to continue their malign influence by keeping the Select Board at three seats and controlling it.
SO, by the language employed in the letters sent to Senator Gobi and Representative Kilcoyne, the latter being daughter of the “Bent Buffoon” himself (the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree), signed by Cranson as Select Board Chair, both of which letters I screen-shotted below (they were sent to me in “Read Only” Pdf. format) but which may not display in this medium, Cranson and Kilcoyne effectively prevented filing of the Bill/Act needed to effect that Select Board expansion.
In response to my latest Public Records Request the Select Board FAILED to produce that Bill/Act with a Senate Bill Number or a House Bill Number on it, meaning that it HAS NOT BEEN FILED IN THE LEGISLATURE.
Cranson and Kilcoyne are dishonest and disreputable game-players who subvert, OUTRIGHT, the will of Sterling voters. REMEMBER THAT WHEN THE 2023 AND 2024 SELECT BOARD ELECTIONS ROLL AROUND. STERLING VOTERS SHOULD BITCH-SLAP THEM BOTH INTO POLITICAL OBLIVION.
J.G.
STERLING, MASSACHUSETTS, OVERWATCH 
To whom does OLPBS refer to when she says “a majority of former select board members do not support this”? How many former members were polled in order to calculate this data? Selective polling I suspect.
Is it possible that citizens are reluctant to sit on a board where they feel they will be ineffective or outnumbered by the two incumbents? Perhaps a five member board would help rectify this. I believe that is why the article passed by a majority.
Paragraphs 3,4,5, and 6 are really not germane to the supposed intent of this letter and I think are prejudicial and show a biased intent to the State Reps, particularly when there is a possible conflict of interest with a blood relationship between involved parties.
LikeLike