Folks, the absolutely insane, out-of-control JACKASSES running the Sterling D.P.W. want us Sterling property taxpayers to cough up $33 million for their proposed new facility, the ‘Garage Mahal,’ and drive up our property tax rate by 11% for years to come.
According to an article in the latest Sterling Meetinghouse News, “The new DPW building will not be a simple ‘town barn.’ It will feature a full-service diesel and gasoline fuel island, a heavy truck repair shop, a vehicle wash bay, and climate-controlled storage for DPW emergency response vehicles. The facility will also include offices, a training room, and other amenities for employees—facilities the current building lacks (emphasis added).”
So there you have it all of you very silly Sterling property taxpayers— FOR $33 MILLION OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS THE JACKASSES RUNNING THE STERLING D.P.W. ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THEIR TRUCKS AND EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE HOUSED IN BETTER CONDITIONS THAN ARE MANY HUMANS IN TOWN! YA, BABY, THE STERLING D.P.W. NEEDS ITS VERY OWN, EXQUISITE ‘GARAGE MAHAL.’
Ya’ think the Sterling D.P.W. officials possess enough common sense to have stopped by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts D.P.W. facility on Chocksett Road, and ALL the other properties with STEEL BUILDINGS along Chocksett Road and Pratts Junction Road, to determine what type of FAR CHEAPER steel building(s) the D.P.W. could design and buy instead of their proposed $33 Million ‘Garage Mahal’? NAH! Steel buildings are too practical, too utilitarian, too prosaic for the Sterling D.P.W.! I mean, why contact steel building suppliers such as those listed below when you can hose Sterling property taxpayers for $33 Million?
According to that same Sterling Meetinghouse News article, those Sterling D.P.W. BUFFOONS “issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to select a designer for the new facility… The selected designer will…evaluate potential sites within Sterling and review the feasibility study, current fleet, and space needs… At the Annual Town Meeting on May 5, 2025 the [Sterling D.P.W.] is requesting $500,000 to advance the project through schematic design and hire an owner’s project manager (OPM).”
That’s right folks, at this year’s Annual Town Meeting the Sterling D.P.W. wants us to pony up $500,000 for a total shot in the dark and several layers of unnecessary bullshit.
By the way, the Sterling D.P.W. already has/uses several parcels in Town. Who says that it needs ONE BIG NEW SPECIALLY DESIGNED/CONSTRUCTED BUILDING RATHER THAN 2-3 SMALLER STEEL BUILDINGS SPREAD AROUND?
That $500,000 spending request is set forth in 2025 Annual Town Meeting Warrant Article 25.
Public school enrollment across the country is going down. Families are leaving their local schools by the thousands. They’ve had enough. They are paying to send their children to private schools or taking on the burdens of homeschooling.
It’s not hard to see why. By virtually every metric, public school education in America is worse than ever before in history. High percentages of children in every grade are reading below their expected grade point level. They can’t do complex (or even easy) math problems. Their knowledge of civics, American government, and history is abysmal. They can’t write coherent paragraphs.
As a result, when students graduate, their reading levels, critical thinking ability, and general knowledge are far below those of a few decades ago. Most colleges must now require remedial classes in basic subjects for students to catch up. Even Stanford, Harvard, and MIT are offering remedial math classes.
But there are some things that the public schools seem to excel at. Most parents are just becoming aware of how thoroughly dominated their schools are by leftist ideology, radical indoctrination, and other toxic non-academic materials and activities. Homosexuality, secret transgender grooming, gender ideology, Planned Parenthood-style sex-ed, pornographic books, anti-Americanism, and far-left political fads (anti-Semitism, “climate change,” etc.) have become standard fare. LGBT “GSA” clubs are in most high schools and many middle schools. There is even a push to start “rainbow clubs” in elementary schools!
Students go through school embracing a range of destructive ideas. And their mental health issues have skyrocketed.
Not surprisingly, good teachers are also leaving the schools. They’ve had enough of the radicalism, the absurd non-learning atmosphere, and the horrible discipline problems caused by “woke” policies imposed by administrators.
It’s not just children who are being irreparably harmed. It’s their families and all of society.
But it doesn’t have to be this way.
Children are capable of great learning. Public school students used to study (and appreciate) Shakespeare, Dickens, Twain, and other great authors. They learned algebra, calculus, and trigonometry. They studied chemistry and physics. They knew geography, history, civics, and astronomy as well as most adults. They could debate and write well (with very good penmanship) and had a larger vocabulary. They learned musical instruments, sang in chorus, and learned to appreciate classical music and even opera.
And beyond that: When Winston Churchill was a boy, his classmates could compose poetry in ancient Greek and Latin. He sometimes reminisced about reading Thucydides in the original Greek in high school.
We can restore education in America! Public schools should be uplifting beacons of learning instead of cesspools of ignorance, propaganda, and perversion.
Parents should want to send their children to the local public schools. Teachers should want to teach at them.
President Trump has opened the door to positive change. His Executive Orders require that school systems that receive federal funding (i.e., all of them) abandon illegal and discriminatory DEI policies and teaching, identity propaganda, destructive gender ideology, and boys in girls’ sports—and implement pro-America courses of study for students.
That is a great start. For the first time in memory, parents have a friend—not an enemy—in their federal government in this regard.
This is an incredible opportunity. It’s a time for parents across the country to jump in and use that starting momentum from the top to force the entire change on the local level. An American revolution in education: All the bad curriculum (and methods) must go. All the radical perversion must go. It must be replaced with true quality.
But in every community, there are big obstacles to making this vision happen. Special interests, big money, and children are a dangerous combination. The national LGBT groups, the teachers’ unions, radical teachers, woke administrators, leftist school committees, and local unhinged leftist activists are all strongly against the reforms that parents want.
In most communities in America, the public schools take up over half of the town’s entire operating budget. Taxpayers—everyone’s taxes—are paying many times the per-pupil cost at similar private schools. We must insist on getting our money’s worth at the public schools.
Like every revolution that’s worth fighting, this will be a very nasty battle. Unfortunately, the conservative movement is not stepping up in any forceful way. But MassResistance has aggressively geared up to help parents make this happen in their communities. The only requirement is that the parents must want this change. It’s not a fight for cowards. But it will be worth it.
***
Brian Camenker is the Director of MassResistance, a leading pro-family activist that provides the information and guidance people need to confront assaults on the traditional family, school children, and the moral foundation of society.
SO, WRSD total student enrollment has dropped by 12.5% over the past 15 Fiscal Years whereas the total WRSD budget has increased 50% over the past 10 Fiscal Years. The WRSD Committee and successive Superintendents have refused to implement ANY Reductions In Force (RIFs), as authorized by Mass.Gen.Laws Ch. 71, Section 42, corresponding with the drop-off in total student enrollment. In fairness to District property taxpayers 12.5% of WRSD employees should be cut. If you aren’t already enraged, it gets even worse– the WRSD proposes, as of right now, A TOTAL BUDGET INCREASE FOR NEXT FISCAL OF 6.18%, FROM $121,979,287 THIS YEAR TO $129,515,225 NEXT FISCAL YEAR. IN ADDITION, THE WRSD PROPOSES TO HIRE 17 NEW TEACHERS. AT THIS YEAR’S STERLING ANNUAL TOWN MEETING VOTE TO SHOOT DOWN THE WRSD’s REQUEST TO STERLING FOR THE ENTIRE AMOUNT ABOVE STERLING’S STATE-REQUIRED NET MINIMUM CONTRIBUTION TO THE WRSD.
Here is entire, current WRSD payroll roster. Read it and gag–
SO the Sterling Planning Board, Chaired by self-dealing developer weasel Carl Corrinne, together with its make-work talking sock puppet Town Planner, propose to alter and gut some key Sterling Zoning By-Law “Definitions”—
The Building Code of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, as the same may be amended from time to time. Terms used in this bylaw shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Building Code unless the context of usage in this bylaw clearly indicates another meaning.
As you can see, the meaning is perfectly clear and EVERYONE knows what is the Massachusetts State Building Code. IT’S THIS AS FOUND ON THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSTTS WEBSITE—
BUILDING CODE or STATE BUILDING CODE Massachusetts State Building Code – 780 CMR consists of a series of international model codes and any state-specific amendments adopted by the Board of Building Regulations and Standards (BBRS). The BBRS regularly updates the state building codes as new information and technology becomes available and change is warranted. These updates are listed here, as well as links to the model codes. Terms used in this bylaw shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Building Code unless the context of usage in this bylaw clearly indicates another meaning.
Do we really need that verbose, idiotic BULLSHIT??? Obviously NOT.
Now let’s look at the proposed new definition of “FAMILY”—
FAMILY A number of individuals living and cooking together on the premises as a single unit., but not more than five unrelated individuals.
The ‘strikethrough’ change ELIMINATES ANY CAP ON THE NUMBER OF UNRELATED PEOPLE WHO CAN LIVE TOGETHER IN A DWELLING UNIT.
THAT’S TOTAL HORSESHIT.
AND IT’S a TOTAL PANDER to the so-called ‘MBTA MULTI-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT COMPLIANCE GUIDELINES” THAT PUT NO LIMIT WHATSOEVER ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO CAN OCCUPY A ‘DWELLING UNIT.’
As we know, the Planning Board and Town Planner have shown over the past 2-3 years that they are F#cking Morons by taking those so-called ‘Compliance Guidelines’ seriously, notwithstanding the clear language of Mass.Gen.Laws Ch. 40A, Sec. 3A and the fact that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled on 8 January 2025, in accordance with that statutory language, that so-called ‘MBTA Multi-Family Zoning Districts’ MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN ½ MILE OF AN MBTA TRAIN/TRANSIT STATION. STERLING HAS NO LAND CLOSER THAN 5-6 MILES TO THE MBTA TRAIN STATION ON NASHUA STREET, LEOMINSTER.
NOW LET’S LOOK AT THE PROPOSED, OUTRAGEOUS, PRO-DEVELOPER DEFINITION OF “FRONTAGE”—
FRONTAGE That portion of a lot fronting upon a street or way, said frontage to be measured along street lines between its side lot lines and their intersection with the streets.
The boundary of a lot coinciding with the street line, being an unbroken distance along a way currently maintained by the Town, county, or state, or along ways shown of the Definitive Plans of approved subdivisions, through which actual access to the potential building site shall be required unless otherwise exempted herein. A street may provide frontage only upon a determination by the Planning Board that it provides adequate access for fire, police, and emergency vehicles. Lot frontage shall be measured continuously along street lines between side lot lines. Lots with interrupted or discontinuous frontage must demonstrate that the required length along the street may be obtained from one continuous frontage section, without any totaling of discontinuous frontage sections.
The ‘strikethrough’ language is the CURRENT definition. The proposed change provides that contiguous/continuous frontage on a street or way IS NO LONGER REQUIRED TO MEET ‘BUILDABLE LOT’ FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS. THAT MEANS THAT A DEVELOPER CAN BUY A PARCEL WHOSE FRONTAGE ON A STREET OR WAY IS INTERRUPTED/SEPARATED BY AN INTERVENING PARCEL OR INTERVENING PARCELS, ADD THE SEPARATE FRONTAGE SEGMENTS TOGETHER, AND THEN CLAIM TOTAL FRONTAGE REQUIRED FOR A BUILDABLE LOT.
NICE TRY CORRINNE, YOU FRIGGIN’ LITTLE WEASEL.
Here’s the proposed new definition of “HOTEL or MOTEL”—
HOTEL or MOTEL
A structure used or designed for overnight lodging, and which may also provide a restaurant and hotel/motel related retail and consumer services to lodgers and the public.
A building or group of buildings providing accommodations on a transient basis for compensation.
The ‘strikethrough’ language is the CURRENT definition and is perfectly adequate. The proposed NEW DEFINITION DOES NOT COVER WHAT WE WOULD CONSIDER TO BE ‘MOTEL CABINS.’ WHAT ABOUT THEM, HUH GENIUSES???
Lastly, we move on to the proposed new definition of “STRUCTURE”—
STRUCTURE A combination of materials assembled to give support or shelter such as buildings, towers, masts, sheds, roofed storage areas, mechanical equipment, swimming pools; but not including signs, fences, septic tanks, and septic systems and accessory facilities associated with the provision of utilities such as drains, wells, transformers, and utility poles.
A combination of materials to form a construction, including among others, buildings, stadiums, tents, reviewing stands, platforms, stagings, observation towers, water tanks, play towers, swimming pools, trestles, sheds, shelters, fences over six feet high, display signs, flagpoles, masts for radio antennas, courts for tennis or similar games, backstops, backboards; the term “structure” shall be construed as if followed by the words “or portion thereof.” A vessel shall not be considered to be a structure.
The ’strikethrough’ language is the CURRENT definition. It is more comprehensive, provides examples, and is THEREFORE PREFERABLE. NOTE that under the proposed NEW definition “accessory facilities associated with the provision of utilities,” including “utility poles,” don’t count as “structures.”
NOW WHY MIGHT THAT BE??? WELL, IT’S BECAUSE CORRINNE WAS CAUGHT WITH HIS PANTS DOWN WHEN HE CLAIMED THAT HIS LAND UNDER THE THREE (3) PARALLEL SETS OF HIGH VOLTAGE LINES AND TOWERS ON THE NATIONAL GRID RIGHT-OF-WAY OFF 100 CLINTON ROAD COUNTED TOWARD THE 60% “OPEN SPACE” HE NEEDED TO CLAIM AS PART OF HIS MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT THERE. UNDER OUR MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT BY-LAWS ‘ABOVE-GROUND’ UTILITIES ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE ON LAND CLAIMED AS REQUIRED “OPEN SPACE.”
SO AGAIN, NICE TRY CORRINNE, YOU FRIGGIN’ LITTLE WEASEL.
CONCLUSION: As a group these proposed Zoning By-Laws “Definition’ changes are objectionable. Shoot them down at the May 2025 Sterling Annual Town Meeting.
Folks, under the TOWN OF STERLING’S EXISTING ZONING BY-LAWS the Planning Board has EXPLICIT AUTHORITY to formulate and adopt internal/housekeeping SITE PLAN regulations.
Regulations. The Planning Board may adopt and from time to time amend reasonable regulations for the administration of these site plan guidelines.
BUT, in a DISHONEST, DECEPTIVE, MALICIOUS PLOY, the Planning Board and Town Planner want 2025 Sterling Annual Town Meeting voters to REVISE THE STERLING ZONING BY-LAWS SUBSTANTIVE SITE PLAN PROVISIONS THEMSELVES AS A FIRST STEP TOWARD A TRULY EVIL SECOND STEP TO BE TAKEN LATER BY THE PLANNING BOARD.
Here is the DISHONEST, DECEPTIVE, MALICIOUS OPENING PARAGRAPH ISSUED BY THE PLANNING BOARD’S TALKING SOCK PUPPET, THE TOWN PLANNER—
“Planner’s Explanation: The Zoning Bylaw’s current Site Plan provision authorizes the Planning Board to adopt Site Plan Regulations, which the Board has not done to this point. Revising the Site Plan section of the Zoning Bylaw will enable the Planning Board to include design guidelines in its new set of Site Plan Regulations. Further, much of the content of the existing bylaw can be moved into the regulations.” ————————————————————————————————
The “Site Plan Regulations” referred to are intended to be INTERNAL, HOUSEKEEPING REGULATIONS DEALING WITH FILING PROTOCOLS, CONTENTS, NOTICES, ETC., NOT SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES TO THE ZONING BY-LAWS THEMSELVES.
SO WHAT FOLLOWS THE DISHONEST, DECEPTIVE, AND MALICIOUS TOWN PLANNER’S/PLANNING BOARD’S OPENING PARAGRAPH, ABOVE???
ANSWER—WHOLESALE CHANGES TO THE SUBSTANTIVE SITE PLAN ZONING BY-LAWS THEMSELVES!
AND HERE IS THE REALLY EVIL, MALICIOUS PORTION OF THE BENT TOWN PLANNER’S EXPLANATION—
“Further, much of the content of the existing bylaw can be moved into the regulations.” ————————————————————————————————”
YEAH, SO LET’S ALTER THE ACTUAL ZONING BY-LAWS SITE PLAN PROVISIONS THEMSELVES AND NEXT MAKE THEM PART OF THE PLANNING BOARD’S INTERNAL REGULATIONS SO THE PLANNING BOARD CAN GUT THEM LATER WITHOUT A TOWN MEETING VOTE.
NEED MORE PROOF THAT THE PLANNING BOARD AND TOWN PLANNER ARE LOW ENOUGH TO BLOW THE BUFFALO ON A NICKEL???
DIDN’T THINK SO.
SHOOT DOWN THAT EVIL, MALICIOUS PROPOSAL AT THE 2025 STERLING ANNUAL TOWN MEETING.
See you at the Town Zoning Forum, Wednesday evening, 19 February 2025.
Well folks, need any more proof that the Planning Board, Chaired by self-dealing developer weasel Carl Corrinne, and the Planning Board’s talking sock puppet, the Town Planner, are pro-development pimps? Then check out their proposals for ZBA Special Permit-granting and Planning Board site plan reviewing—
§ 301-6.3.4 Special Permits that require Site Plan review. For development projects that require a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals and Site Plan approval from the Planning Board, the applicant may apply for both concurrently and request a joint public hearing by both Boards. When a joint public hearing is requested, both boards will coordinate a public hearing date and provide proper public notice per MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11. The procedural order shall be that the Zoning Board of Appeals shall issue its Special Permit decision first, followed by the Planning Board issuing its Site Plan decision.
§ 301-6.4.4 Site Plans that require Special Permits. For development projects that require a Site Plan approval from the Planning Board and a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals, the applicant may apply for both concurrently and request a joint public hearing by both Boards. When a joint public hearing is requested, both boards will coordinate a public hearing date and provide proper public notice per MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11. The procedural order shall be that the Zoning Board of Appeals shall issue its Special Permit decision first, followed by the Planning Board issuing its Site Plan decision.
Just how stupid do the Planning Board and Town Planner think we are? It’s the Site Plan review process that gets into a development proposal’s NITTY-GRITTY, including objectionable details, but as you can see the Planning Board wants to force the Sterling Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) to issue Special Permits BEFORE the Planning Board completes its duty to render Site Plan Review determinations.
THAT’S TOTALLY ASS-BACKWARDS AND THEY KNOW IT.
AND YEAH, THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE TOWN PLANNER ARE ASSHOLES.
SHOOT DOWN THIS PROPOSAL AT STERLING’S MAY ANNUAL TOWN MEETING.
See you at the Zoning Forum Wednesday night, 19 February 2025—
As a Paxton reader of this Blog wrote last week, “The WRSC [WRSD Committee] is a disaster of epic proportions.” SEE previous Blog post on the ‘SECRET’ 4 February 2025 meeting involving the WRSD Committee, the WRSD Superintendent, and officials representing the 5 WRSD towns.
The fact that the WRSD Committee is and has been stupid, detached, incompetent, and dishonest is illustrated by the 14 February 2025 email sent by Sterling WRSD Committee member Linda Woodland to a Sterling voter who asked about the WRSD’s switch to a ‘new’ curriculum.
“Dear Ms. ______,
Thank you for reaching out. I too would like the Sterling FinCom meetings to be recorded and broadcast. The meeting on February 27th at 6:30pm is open to the public. It will be at the Media Center at WRHS, and should be recorded and broadcast. I will double check that to be sure, but please know that the public is welcome to attend. I can’t answer all of your questions, but I can provide some history to the curriculum choice that was discussed at the meeting we both attended.
Before my time on the committee, Dr. McCall’s administration selected Fontas & Pinnell (F&P) for the elementary ELA curriculum. It was purchased, I believe, around 2016 and first implemented for Kindergarteners for the 2017-2018 school year. Teachers were trained in it one grade-level per year while using the previous curriculum (I believe it was Fundations), and then implemented Fontas & Pinnell the next year. It took a very long time to unroll from grade to grade. From what I understand, many other districts were adopting F&P around the same time, too.
Sometime around 2020-2022, F&P curriculum was identified as an incomplete curriculum for teaching to read. The big problem is that it does not teach phonics, but rather encourages kids to guess at words. This method can work for some kids, but not nearly enough. Many school districts across MA were using this curriculum, and so this is a widespread problem with ELA instruction. WRSD is not alone in facing this problem. Now, DESE implemented a new method of rating curriculum, and created a standard for earning the label “High Quality Instructional Materials”. They also created grants to help districts to dump F&P and select a different curriculum that meets these new standards. WRSD received such a grant sometime in FY23 or FY24 for researching and selecting new curriculum, and now teachers are using the new ELA curriculum for K-5 students. So far it looks like a big improvement, but testing the results is still in early stages.
From what I understand, Dr. McCall’s administration selected and implemented the curriculum without formally requesting a vote from the School Committee, however I do not know exactly how that happened. I began on the committee in 2019, and this curriculum change was in 2015 or 2016. Typically a school committee is asked to approve major curriculum changes that are selected by the administration, but does not make the actual selection. The current administration has begun a curriculum selection process that involves information from DESE and significant involvement of teachers and principals, to put curriculum under a microscope before it’s selected. I do not know how Dr. McCall’s administration selected the curriculum before this, and none of the administrators from Central Office from that time are still employed by the district (emphasis added).
Best,
Linda”
SO phonics was eliminated from the WRSD curriculum in or about 2017-2018 and the WRSD Committee didn’t realize until 2020-2022 that WRSD kids were not learning to read properly BECAUSE phonics was omitted from the F&P curriculum. BRILLIANT ENGAGEMENT ON THEIR PART.
Ms. Woodland indicates that previous WRSD Superintendent McCall, who retired after it came to light that he had overspent the authorized WRSD budget by $1.6 million a couple years ago, “selected and implemented the [F&P] curriculum without formally requesting a vote from the School Committee.”
WELL, that’s BULLSHIT. The F&P curriculum, the one without phonics, “was purchased… around 2016” according Ms. Woodland. NOTHING can be purchased by the WRSD without authorized representatives of the WRSD Committee first signing a written spending authorization called a “Warrant.” Spending Warrants are approved by vote of the ENTIRE WRSD Committee.
SO the WRSD Committee knew damned well in 2016 that the F&P curriculum was purchased and would be implemented. They just didn’t care enough to find out what was in it, or what wasn’t in it.
The WRSD Committee is the WRSD’s governing body. IT controls the Superintendent and the curriculum, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.
Mass.Gen.Laws Ch. 71, Sec. 37 provides:
“The school committee in each city and town and each regional school district shallhave the power to select and to terminate the superintendent, shall review and approve budgets for public education in the district, and shallestablish educational goals and policies for the schools in the district consistent with the requirements of law and statewide goals and standards established by the board of education. The school committee in each city, town and regional school district may select a superintendent jointly with other school committees and the superintendent shall serve as the superintendent of all of the districts that selected him (emphasis added).”
It is clear then that the WRSD Committee is and has been so detached and incompetent that it has abdicated its duty to oversee and control Superintendents and has abdicated its duty to oversee and implement an effective curriculum.
Due to the WRSD Committee’s stupidity, detachment, dereliction of statutory duty, and utter incompetence WRSD students are now reading at three (3) grade levels below where they should be.
As a matter of FACT the WRSD Committee authorized and paid for the F&P curriculum that omitted phonics, an essential tool for FIRST AND SECOND GRADERS to learn vowel sounds in order to sound out spelled words.
Phonics is not rocket science and has been an essential learning tool for MANY decades.
The WRSD Committee can try to evade blame for the current WRSD reading level disaster by pointing the finger at long-gone Superintendent McCall, but under Massachusetts law the responsibility for that disaster lies ENTIRELY WITH THEM.
Tired of funding WRSD institutional bloat, dishonesty, and incompetence??? Then start forcing needed changes by voting down the WRSD’s bloated 2025-2026 budget request during this year’s Annual Town Meeting.
SO, ya’ think that the WRSD prioritizes reading, writing, math, science, English, geography, history, foreign languages, etc.? NAH, YOU SILLY DISTRICT-WIDE PROPERTY TAXPAYERS! THE WRSD PRIORITIZES LGTBQ BRAINWASHING/PROPAGANDA AS DISPLAYED JUST INSIDE THE THOMAS PRINCE SCHOOL ENTRANCE IN PRINCETON. PLAY THE VIDEO. AND YOU JUST KNOW THAT THIS TYPE OF CRAP IS ON DISPLAY IN SCHOOLS ACROSS THE DISTRICT.
Could the WRSD AT LEAST ENDORSE “GAYS AGAINST GROOMERS”???
STERLING, MASSACHUSETTS, OVERWATCH 