DOPERS, AND THEIR COMMERCIAL SUPPLIER WHORES, DEGRADE SOCIETY. VOTE ‘NO’ ON NOVEMBER BALLOT QUESTION 4

When it comes to self-abuse, and risking the safety non-dopers such as innocent drivers and their passengers using taxpayer-funded public ways, dopers, like drunks, aren’t known for self-restraint. AND, of course, their wholesale and retail suppliers/enablers are amoral, profiteering sociopath whores—and the same goes for city and town officials who encourage them in order to increase their respective ‘tax bases.’

SO NOW, VIA NOVEMBER BALLOT QUESTION 4, the dopers and their degenerate allies want to legalize the cultivation, sale, and possession of so-called ‘psychedelic/hallucinogenic mushrooms,’ as though they are harmless personal playthings. They are not. Psilocybin, referred to explicitly in Ballot Question 4, along with LSD and heroin, is on Schedule 1 of controlled substances the possession and distribution of which constitute very serious federal crimes. SEE Drug Fact Sheet: Psilocybin (dea.gov), Psilocybin Fast Facts (justice.gov)

This is what the Massachusetts Legislature’s Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions had to say, in pertinent part, about Ballot Question 4:

“The petition would both create a system of state-licensed and taxed [cultivation and retail] facilities on the one hand, and on the other, decriminalize the cultivation, possession, and distribution of a variety of hallucinogenic and psychedelic substances. Voters are, therefore, being asked to simultaneously establish a … costly licensure [and regulatory] system…while at the same time making the same substances widely available for individual cultivation across the Commonwealth in a non-licensed manner … [allowing] residents to carry many doses…on their person or in their home at one time. It therefore…allows an unlicensed cultivator to ‘gift’…certain doses… [T]his loophole would…subvert the safety regulations imposed on licensed [growers/sellers],,, The petition would also require municipalities to zone for and permit these licensed [growers/sellers] while capping their ability to levy a tax rate [determined] appropriate to manage traffic, …inspections, and any increased calls requesting the assistance of law enforcement or medical professionals… [The petition] OUGHT NOT TO BE ENACTED… “(emphasis added).

VOTE ‘NO’ ON NOVEMBER BALLOT QUESTION 4.

J.G.